“Sexual harassment is the most heinous conduct that plagues the workplace.” (Extract from the judgment below)
Our courts have no tolerance for sexual harassment in the workplace, stressing that, at its core, it is concerned with power dynamics at work.
A recent Labour Court decision has confirmed that in assessing whether or not an employee is guilty of such harassment, it is the victim’s perspective that must lie at the heart of the enquiry. Victims will take heart from this decision, while employers and other employees should understand clearly the dangers of not heeding it.
Manager fired after inviting an employee to sit on his lap
A bank manager was found guilty of two counts of gross misconduct in respect of:
- Sexual harassment: Allegations of inappropriate, unwelcome comments towards a female employee, which she said continued despite her asking him to stop.These comments were about her hair, clothing and appearance, such as “you are so beautiful”, “you are so stunning”, and “black looks good on you.” Most tellingly perhaps, he suggested that she sit on his lap when he was taking employee temperatures as part of a Covid screening process. All conduct that, she said, upset and offended her.
- A harassment allegation of slamming a metal recycling bin lid to frighten her.
The manager denied all these allegations but was found guilty and summarily dismissed. He approached the CCMA (Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration) where the arbitrator, deciding that the employee was untruthful and that no harassment had been proved, held that the dismissal was substantively unfair and awarded the manager R400k in back pay.
The bank took this decision on review to the Labour Court, which reversed the finding and confirmed the manager’s dismissal.
Let’s have a look at the Court’s reasoning.
Firstly, what exactly amounts to “harassment” and “sexual harassment”?
In general terms:
- Harassment is unwanted conduct which impairs dignity, which creates a hostile or intimidating work environment for one or more employees, and is related to prohibited grounds of discrimination like race, gender, or disability.
- Sexual harassment refers to persistent, unsolicited, and unwanted sexual advances or suggestions by one person to another. The “Code of Good Practice on Sexual Harassment” sets out guidelines for identifying and handling such cases.
The victim’s point of view is critical
The Court in deciding to confirm the manager’s dismissal commented that sexual harassment is heinous conduct. As it goes to the root of one’s being, it must be viewed from the victim’s point of view, how the victim perceived it and whether or not that perception is reasonable.
In this case, held the Court, the employee’s evidence was supported by the probabilities and was more credible than her manager’s version. He was accordingly guilty of the charges of harassment and sexual harassment, his employer could not fairly have been expected to continue the employment relationship with him, and his dismissal was fair.
Victims will take heart from this outcome, and it’s a warning to both employers and other employees to view all workplace conduct from the perspective of those on the receiving end.
Perhaps a good way of looking at it could be this: Might the recipient of a “compliment” or other “innocuous” conduct reasonably construe it as inappropriate and unwelcome? If so, employers have a duty to act, and perpetrators are in trouble.
Disclaimer: The information provided herein should not be used or relied on as professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact us for specific and detailed advice.
© LawDotNews
